We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Case legislation is specific into the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. For instance, a ruling inside a California appellate court would not typically be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Additionally, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and 120 of the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the instant petition on the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner as well as private respondents and will acquire care of all of the components of the case and make certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
The proposal appears to be reasonable and acceded to. Inside the meantime police shall remain neutral within the private dispute between the parties, however, if any from the individuals is indulged in criminal exercise the police shall acquire prompt action against them under regulation. 5. The instant petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the law, he finds that, whilst it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it's actually fairly vague about whether the ninety-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based about the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held into the ninety-working day notice necessity, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents in the boy or Female usually do not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they might do if they're able to Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who gives this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by legislation.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, It is usually a effectively-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue to your procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to really make it acceptable to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified by the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative with the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Therefore, the competent authority from the parent department in the petitioner and also the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release check here the pensionary amount of your petitioner and fork out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits for the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent is additionally directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits in the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar issue. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in making use of the law. This example of case legislation refers to two cases read during the state court, with the same level.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent and the case under appeal, Potentially overruling the previous case regulation by setting a completely new precedent of higher authority. This may well come about several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of your High Court of Justice, later on the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his advancement on the concept of estoppel starting within the High Trees case.
refers to regulation that comes from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case law, also known as “common legislation,” and “case precedent,” delivers a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And exactly how They're applied in certain types of case.